Citation
Jong, Ita Yee Ping
(2002)
Synthesis and Characterisation of Vanadium Antimony Oxide Catalysts.
Masters thesis, Universiti Putra Malaysia.
Abstract
V -Sb-oxide catalysts are commercially viable catalysts for the ammoxidation of propane
to acrylonitrile, a novel and considerable cost saving route compared to the current
industrial method which utilizes the ammoxidation of propene. The characteristic of VSb-
oxide catalysts were studied and analyzed in relation to their structural/composition
features using X-ray diffraction (XRD), Fourier Transform Infrared (FTIR), Brunauer-
Emmett-Teller (BET) surface area, Scanning Electron Micrograph (SEM), Energy
Dispersive X-ray (EDX) microanalysis and Thermogravimetric Analysis (TGA).
Results showed significant difference in presence of crystalline phases, surface area,
porosity and morphologies in the samples prepared according to three different methods,
i.e. solid state (88) reaction, sol-gel (G8) and deposition on antimonic acid (DAA)
methods, as a function of the Sb:V ratio and heat treatment. XRD and FTIR studies
revealed that the calcination temperature at 500°C is not suitable for the V -Sb-oxide
catalysts as there is little or no VSb04 formed in some samples. Sb/V ratio of2 or more
is recommended for the GS method as there is hardly any Sb species formed for samples with 5bN ratio = 1. For the 55 method, sample calcined at 700°C with SbN ratio = 1
would be deemed the best as it has the highest amount of VSb04• Raising of calcination
temperature had a detrimental effect on the surface area of the GS and DAA catalysts
but bore no significant effect on SS catalysts. The EDX microanalysis showed
antimony enrichment on the surface the catalysts. The study of TPD revealed the
evolution of lattice oxygen from the catalysts. In TPR, the amount of oxygen desorbed
from the catalysts prepared by SS method is found to be much higher compared to the
other methods, i.e. about 16.7 times higher than GS method and 6.3 times higher than
DAA method (for SbN = 1) whilst for ratio 3, it is 21.3 times higher than GS method
and 14.5 times higher than DAA method.
Download File
Additional Metadata
Actions (login required)
|
View Item |