Citation
Ahmad, Nor Monica
(2018)
Development of phenolic electrochemical biosensors using ZrO₂, CeO₂ and ionic liquids-tyrosinase nanocomposites.
Doctoral thesis, Universiti Putra Malaysia.
Abstract
Phenolic compounds are one of the types of pollution that is present in water sources
due to the effluents of a various industries such manufacturing, pharmaceutical, resin
paint and textile wood. They are included by the Environmental Protection Agency’s
(EPA) as part of the priority pollutants due to its persistency and toxicity to the
environment. In this study, three biosensors were developed to detect phenolic
compounds which is practical to be used for sample in the environment with fast
response, high selectivity, cost-effectiveness and simplicity of operation. The
development of the phenolic biosensor was carried out by using screen printed
carbon electrode (SPCE), hexadecyltrimethylammonium bromide (CTAB) and
polyethylene glycol (PEG), zirconium oxide (ZrO2), cerium oxide (CeO2) and 1-
butyl-3-methylimidazolium nitrate (BMIMNO3).
These biosensors were named as ZrO2/Tyr, ZrO2/BMIMNO3/Tyr and
CeO2/BMIMNO3/Tyr. They were similar in the approach of electrode modification
and enzyme immobilisation except in the used of different metal oxide and addition
of ionic liquid on the electrode surface. The modified electrode was analysed using
Scanning Electron Microscope- Energy-dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (SEM-EDX),
Electrochemical Impedance Spectroscopy (EIS) and Cyclic Voltammetry (CV). The
optimisation for the biosensors were enzyme loading, applied potential, pH,
percentage of modifier and volume of nanocomposite that deposited onto the
electrode. The biosensors required 10 mg/mL enzyme loading, pH range from 6 – 7,
potential range from – 0.10 V until – 0.20 V, 2.0 – 3.0 percent of modifier and 2.0 –
2.5 μL of nanocomposite deposited. These biosensors operated at different potential
versus Ag/AgCl which was – 0.20 V and – 0.10 V for ZrO2/Tyr,
ZrO2/BMIMNO3/Tyr and CeO2/BMIMNO3/Tyr, respectively. The fastest response time was in the following order: ZrO2/Tyr (10 s) > ZrO2/BMIMNO3/Tyr (15 s) >
CeO2/BMIMNO3/Tyr (30 s). The limit of detection (LOD) of the 3 biosensors was
found comparable 0.11 μM for ZrO2/Tyr, ZrO2/BMIMNO3/Tyr and
CeO2/BMIMNO3/Tyr respectively. The linearity of the biosensor was 0.075 – 55
μM, 0.25 – 30 μM and 0.25 – 40 μM for ZrO2/Tyr, ZrO2/BMIMNO3/Tyr and
CeO2/BMIMNO3/Tyr respectively. Sensitivity of the biosensors was found highest
for ZrO2/Tyr (219.5 nA/μM followed ZrO2/BMIMNO3/Tyr (133.79 nA/μM) and
CeO2/BMIMNO3/Tyr (80.86 nA/μM).
Download File
Additional Metadata
Actions (login required)
|
View Item |