Citation
Abstract
A large combine harvester has long been used for harvesting rice in Malaysia. Recently, a mini combine harvester has been introduced into this industry to be a low-cost alternative for a large combine harvester. Thus, this study was carried out to compare the field efficiency (FE), effective field capacity (EFC), fuel consumption (FC), and field machine index (FMI) between a mini combine harvester (MCH) and large combine harvester (LCH) under similar field conditions. The field performances of the combine harvesters were measured during harvest operation in two consecutive seasons. The EFC for both MCH and LCH in harvest operation were found to be 0.91 and 1.30 ha/hr, respectively. In terms of the FE, MCH had 0.78% higher efficiency than LCH. For the FMI, LCH and MCH had 0.86 and 0.87, respectively. For the FC, LCH consumed more fuel (14.51 L/ha) as compared to MCH (14.25 L/ha). T-test statistical analysis showed that there was no significant difference between LCH and MCH for FE, EFC, FMI and FC. The results suggested that MCH was more efficient and economical in conducting the harvest operation in a rice field.
Download File
Full text not available from this repository.
Official URL or Download Paper: https://www.myfoodresearch.com/vol-39474issue-2.ht...
|
Additional Metadata
Item Type: | Article |
---|---|
Divisions: | Faculty of Engineering |
DOI Number: | https://doi.org/10.26656/fr.2017.3(2).136 |
Publisher: | Rynnye Lyan Resources |
Keywords: | Field performance; Large combine harvester; Mini combine harvester; Field capacity; Rice production |
Depositing User: | Nurul Ainie Mokhtar |
Date Deposited: | 23 Mar 2023 04:07 |
Last Modified: | 23 Mar 2023 04:07 |
Altmetrics: | http://www.altmetric.com/details.php?domain=psasir.upm.edu.my&doi=10.26656/fr.2017.3(2).136 |
URI: | http://psasir.upm.edu.my/id/eprint/79894 |
Statistic Details: | View Download Statistic |
Actions (login required)
View Item |