Citation
Amoozegar, Azadeh
(2017)
Perceived learning as a mediator between institutional factors, instructor immediacy behavior, learner characteristics and course satisfaction among undergraduate distance learners.
Doctoral thesis, Universiti Putra Malaysia.
Abstract
Distance learning in Malaysia has seen phenomenal growth especially in higher
education where there are numerous universities offering online courses that have
specifically provided access to students who were challenged by space and time
constraints. In spite of the dramatic increase of online courses and student enrollment,
there are many indications that online courses are unsuccessful at meeting students’
needs and students are dissatisfied with their online course experiences, which brings
about a serious concern regarding the dropout rates of online courses. For solving this
issue, it is crucial that researchers identify and study the factors that lead to student
satisfaction with online courses because course satisfaction is considered to be the
largest determinant in reducing dropout in distance learning environment. Hence, the
purpose of this study is to identify factors contributing to course satisfaction among
distance learners in Malaysian research universities. The factors are categorized into
institutional factors (administrative support, technology support, and university
support), learner characteristics (motivation, self-regulated learning and self-efficacy)
and instructor immediacy behavior. Further, investigate the role of perceived learning
as a mediator, and finally, develop a model for course satisfaction in distance
education setting. These factors were selected based on the social presence and
transactional distance theory and on previous studies on satisfaction of students.
This study is based on a quantitative descriptive design with sample size of 367
undergraduates’ students in the third-fourth years at Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia
(UKM) and Universiti Putra Malaysia (UPM). The sample was selected based on the
proportional stratified technique. The main instrument used was a questionnaire,
which was adopted from previous studies whose content validity was checked by panel of experts. A pilot study was conducted on 30 students to assist the reliability of the
instrument, which ranged from 0.79 and 0.88 by the value of Cronbach’s alpha.
The data was analyzed descriptively using IBM SPSS and inferentially using the
Analysis of Moment Structure (AMOS). The descriptive findings indicated that course
satisfaction level was a moderate. Among eight variables affecting course satisfaction
only motivation and self-efficacy were found to be high; whereas the level of other
variables including perceived learning, technical, administrative, and university
support, instructor immediacy behavior and self-regulated learning were moderate.
Among 22 hypotheses were tested, 20 were supported. Two hypotheses did not
support in this study. The first one is the influence of technical support on perceived
learning, which is rejected. Perceived learning also was not identified as mediator
factor that influence technical support towards course satisfaction.
The most salient factor influencing course satisfaction was instructor immediacy
behavior (β= 0.236, P< 0.01), followed by administrative support (β= 0.198, P<
0.001), university support (β= 0.229, P< 0.001), and self-efficacy (β= 0.179, P= 0.01).
Contrary, technical support (β= 0.11, P= 0.039) and self-regulated learning (β= 0.11,
P= 0.034) perceived as less important factor influencing course satisfaction among
distance learning students in Malaysian Research Universities. The findings of this
study concurred that the influence of administrative support (β= 0.06, P= 0.007),
university support (β= 0.049, P=0.013) and instructor immediacy behavior (β= 0.094,
P=0.001) partially mediated by perceived learning, whereas the influence of
motivation (β= 0.058, P= 0.021), self-regulated learning (β= 0.042, P= 0.038), and
self-efficacy (β= 0.076, P= 0.003) fully mediated by perceived learning. The results
attained from the analyses also produced a model that predicts the satisfaction of
students among the undergraduates, which explained 69.7% of course satisfaction.
Several implications were also drawn from the findings of this study. The proposed
model is a definitive model that synthesizes what is known and provides knowledge
to guide future research in related field.
Download File
Additional Metadata
Actions (login required)
|
View Item |