UPM Institutional Repository

Effects of physical training programs on healthy athletes’ vertical jump height: a systematic review with meta-analysis


Citation

Ma, Shuzhen and Xu, Yanqi and Xu, Simao (2025) Effects of physical training programs on healthy athletes’ vertical jump height: a systematic review with meta-analysis. Journal of Sports Science and Medicine, 24 (2). pp. 236-257. ISSN 1303-2968

Abstract

Various physical training programs are widely used to enhance vertical jump height, but their relative effectiveness remains de-bated. This systematic review and meta-analysis evaluate effectiveness of four training methods-weight resistance, plyometric, complex, and routine training-on vertical jump height. A comprehensive search of six databases (PubMed, ERIC, Google Scholar, Web of Science, EBSCOhost, and Scopus) identified rel-evant studies coded based on training type, modality, and out-come measures. Methodological quality and statistical analysis were assessed using PEDro scale and R (version 4.1.3) with the 'meta' package. Eight studies revealed that plyometric training and weight resistance exercise increased vertical jump by 5.2 cm (95% CI: 2.6, 7.7 cm; I² = 4.7%) and 9.9 cm (95% CI: 6.7, 13.5 cm; I² = 0.0%), while improved squat jump by 1.5 cm (95% CI: 0.2, 2.6 cm; I² = 0.0%) and 3.1 cm (95% CI: 0.2, 2.6 cm; I² = 16.9%) compared to routine training. Fifteen studies indicated that plyometric training, weight resistance exercise, and complex training increased countermovement jump by 2.0 cm (95% CI: 1.4, 3.7 cm; I² = 0.0%), 2.2 cm (95% CI: 1.4, 3.7 cm; I² = 0.0%), and 5.0 cm (95% CI: 2.5, 7.6 cm; I² = 0.0%) compared to routine training. Complex training was more effective than weight resistance (2.6 cm; 95% CI: 0.2, 5.5 cm) and plyometric training (2.9 cm; 95% CI: 0.2, 5.8 cm), with no significant difference between weight resistance and plyometric training (0.2 cm; 95% CI:-1.0, 2.0 cm). Heterogeneity was low for most comparisons (I² = 0.0% to 16.9%), indicating consistent results across different in-terventions. This meta-analysis demonstrates that plyometric, weight resistance, and complex training significantly improve vertical, squat, and countermovement jump performance. Weight resistance is effective for vertical and stationary vertical jumps, while complex training is most effective for countermovement jumps.


Download File

[img] Text
121038.pdf - Published Version
Restricted to Repository staff only

Download (2MB)
Official URL or Download Paper: https://www.jssm.org/jssm-24-236.xml%3EFulltext

Additional Metadata

Item Type: Article
Divisions: Faculty of Educational Studies
DOI Number: https://doi.org/10.52082/jssm.2025.236
Publisher: Journal of Sport Science and Medicine
Keywords: Athletes; Physical training programs; Statistical analyses; Training performance; Vertical jump
Depositing User: Ms. Nuraida Ibrahim
Date Deposited: 23 Oct 2025 00:16
Last Modified: 23 Oct 2025 00:16
Altmetrics: http://www.altmetric.com/details.php?domain=psasir.upm.edu.my&doi=10.52082/jssm.2025.236
URI: http://psasir.upm.edu.my/id/eprint/121038
Statistic Details: View Download Statistic

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item