UPM Institutional Repository

Investigating methodological trends of hedging strategies in academic discourse: a systematic literature review


Citation

Deng, Zhujun and Mohamad Ali, Afida and Mohd Zin, Zaid (2025) Investigating methodological trends of hedging strategies in academic discourse: a systematic literature review. World Journal of English Language, 15 (5). pp. 322-334. ISSN 1925-0703; eISSN: 1925-0711

Abstract

This systematic literature review investigated the methodological trends regarding hedging strategies in academic discourse from 2014 to 2023. A total of 40 peer-reviewed empirical studies were analyzed, focusing on aspects such as publication year, regional participation, sample size, genre type, research design, category, discipline, section, and analytical framework. The review revealed a fluctuating interest in hedging strategies, peaking in 2023, with significant contributions from Asia and Europe. Research articles dominated the genre types, reflecting a preference for standardized and accessible formats. Mixed methods were the most common research design, followed by quantitative and qualitative approaches. Mono-disciplinary studies were prevalent, highlighting detailed analyses within specific fields, whereas cross-disciplinary, cross-cultural, cross-linguistic and cross-generic studies emphasized comparative approaches. The research spanned both hard and soft sciences, with applied linguistics and chemistry being notably represented. Comprehensive examinations of all sections of academic texts, particularly the discussion section, were frequent. Established frameworks, primarily those by Hyland (1998) and Salager-Meyer (1994), were commonly utilized, underscoring their influence. This review highlighted the need for more cross-disciplinary and cross-generic analyses and the development of comprehensive frameworks to enrich the understanding of hedging strategies in academic writing. Future research should expand cross-disciplinary, cross-cultural, and regional analyses, develop new frameworks, explore emerging genres, integrate technology, diversify methodologies, and address geographical disparities to broaden the global understanding of hedging in academic discourse.


Download File

[img] Text
127310.pdf - Published Version
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution.

Download (794kB)

Additional Metadata

Item Type: Article
Subject: Language and Linguistics
Subject: Education
Subject: Linguistics and Language
Divisions: Faculty of Modern Language and Communication
DOI Number: https://doi.org/10.5430/wjel.v15n5p322
Publisher: Sciedu Press
Keywords: Academic discourse; Hedging strategies; Methodological trends; Systematic literature review
Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs): SDG 4: Quality Education, SDG 9: Industry, Innovation and Infrastructure, SDG 17: Partnerships for the Goals
Depositing User: Ms. Nur Faseha Mohd Kadim
Date Deposited: 23 Jul 2026 07:19
Last Modified: 23 Jul 2026 07:19
Altmetrics: http://www.altmetric.com/details.php?domain=psasir.upm.edu.my&doi=10.5430/wjel.v15n5p322
URI: http://psasir.upm.edu.my/id/eprint/127310
Statistic Details: View Download Statistic

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item