UPM Institutional Repository

Comparative analysis of ultrasonic inspection techniques for corrosion monitoring in petrochemical plants using Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP)


Citation

Jan, Lean Tai and Hameed Sultan, Mohamed Thariq and Shahar, Farah Syazwani (2025) Comparative analysis of ultrasonic inspection techniques for corrosion monitoring in petrochemical plants using Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP). Pertanika Journal of Science and Technology, 33 (3). pp. 1439-1457. ISSN 0128-7680; eISSN: 2231-8526

Abstract

Selecting non-destructive inspection methods for corrosion monitoring and detection in petrochemical plants frequently relies on personal preferences rather than a rigorous assessment of the underlying rationale for specific testing techniques. Unchecked corrosion can lead to catastrophic failure; however, many of these inspection techniques are inefficient. Plant owners often struggle to select an inspection technique that is both time-efficient and provides good detectability. This study applied the Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP) to identify the best ultrasonic testing technique for corrosion monitoring in process plants. Three techniques were evaluated: pulse-echo ultrasonic testing (UT A-Scan), ultrasonic thickness gauging (UTG), and phased-array ultrasonic testing corrosion mapping (PAUT-CM). Four attributes—time efficiency, defect detection, accuracy, and personnel training time—were identified from an initial set of eight attributes through expert surveys to construct the AHP framework. PAUT-CM demonstrated the highest efficiency, detectability, and accuracy, while UTG had the lowest training requirements. The AHP results indicated that PAUT-CM achieved the highest score of 0.4846, reflecting its effectiveness in extensive corrosion mapping scenarios. In contrast, UTG or UT A-Scan may yield higher scores in situations where only a limited number of spot detections are required. By implementing the systematic approach proposed in this study, engineers can mitigate subjective bias and make informed decisions when selecting the most suitable testing method.


Download File

[img] Text
127089.pdf - Published Version
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial No Derivatives.

Download (2MB)

Additional Metadata

Item Type: Article
Subject: Computer Science (all)
Subject: Chemical Engineering (all)
Subject: Environmental Science (all)
Divisions: Faculty of Engineering
Institute of Tropical Forestry and Forest Products
DOI Number: https://doi.org/10.47836/pjst.33.3.16
Publisher: Universiti Putra Malaysia Press
Keywords: AHP; Non-destructive testing; Phased array ultrasonic testing; Ultrasonic testing
Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs): SDG 9: Industry, Innovation and Infrastructure, SDG 12: Responsible Consumption and Production, SDG 8: Decent Work and Economic Growth
Depositing User: Ms. Nur Faseha Mohd Kadim
Date Deposited: 14 Jul 2026 08:15
Last Modified: 14 Jul 2026 08:15
Altmetrics: http://www.altmetric.com/details.php?domain=psasir.upm.edu.my&doi=10.47836/pjst.33.3.16
URI: http://psasir.upm.edu.my/id/eprint/127089
Statistic Details: View Download Statistic

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item