UPM Institutional Repository

Screening for Borderline Personality Disorder (BPD) in Malaysia: a validation study of the McLean Screening Instrument for BPD


Citation

Keng, Shian Ling and Mohd Salleh Sahimi, Hajar and Chan, Lai Fong and Tan, Kit Aun and Vafa, Samira and Zainal, Nur Hani and Woon, Luke Sy Cherng and Sim, Su Hua and Wong, Man Kuan and Eu, Choon Leng (2025) Screening for Borderline Personality Disorder (BPD) in Malaysia: a validation study of the McLean Screening Instrument for BPD. Borderline Personality Disorder and Emotion Dysregulation, 12 (1). art. no. 34. pp. 1-13. ISSN 2051-6673

Abstract

Background: Borderline personality disorder (BPD) is often underdiagnosed in Malaysia due to limited specialized training and validated screening tools. Although the McLean Screening Instrument for BPD (MSI-BPD) is a well-established measure, it lacks validation in Southeast Asia. This study evaluated the MSI-BPD’s psychometric properties in a Malaysian context. Methods: Two samples, including a clinical sample of psychiatric outpatients (N = 101; mean age = 28.02 years; 74.3% female) and a healthy control group (N = 314; mean age = 29.75 years; 74.8% female), were recruited from a public hospital in Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia and a private university in Malaysia, respectively. Participants in the clinical sample completed the MSI-BPD along with other self-report psychological symptom measures, and BPD diagnoses were confirmed through a semi-structured clinical interview. Psychometric analyses were conducted on the clinical sample to assess the scale’s internal consistency, convergent and discriminant validity, factor structure, and predictive validity concerning BPD diagnosis. Both the clinical and healthy control samples were included in a known-groups validity analysis to further evaluate the scale. Results: The MSI-BPD exhibited good internal consistency (Cronbach’s α = 0.82) and convergent validity, as evidenced by significant correlations with related psychological symptoms. The scale also demonstrated good discriminant validity and predictive accuracy (area under the curve = 0.91), with an optimal cut-off score of 8. Confirmatory factor analyses supported a four-factor model (with factors identified being affective disturbances, impulsivity, unstable relationships, and disturbed cognition) as the best fit among the five evaluated models. The study also established the known-groups validity of the MSI-BPD, demonstrating its ability to distinguish clinical samples from healthy controls, with clinical participants scoring significantly higher than controls. Conclusions: The MSI-BPD is a valid and reliable tool for screening BPD in Malaysia. The findings enhance our understanding of BPD’s construct validity and factor structure in Southeast Asia, which leads to a more universal and cross-cultural understanding of BPD. Validating the screening instrument is crucial for improving mental health assessments and interventions, as well as strategies to better identify individuals at-risk for BPD for early intervention optimizing outcomes in a low-resource Southeast Asian context.


Download File

[img] Text
124550.pdf - Published Version
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial No Derivatives.

Download (1MB)

Additional Metadata

Item Type: Article
Subject: Clinical Psychology
Subject: Psychiatry and Mental Health
Subject: Biological Psychiatry
Divisions: Faculty of Medicine and Health Science
DOI Number: https://doi.org/10.1186/s40479-025-00309-z
Publisher: BioMed Central
Keywords: Borderline personality disorder; McLean screening instrument for BPD; Psychiatric outpatients; Psychometric validation
Depositing User: MS. HADIZAH NORDIN
Date Deposited: 14 Apr 2026 03:42
Last Modified: 14 Apr 2026 03:42
Altmetrics: http://www.altmetric.com/details.php?domain=psasir.upm.edu.my&doi=10.1186/s40479-025-00309-z
URI: http://psasir.upm.edu.my/id/eprint/124550
Statistic Details: View Download Statistic

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item