Prioritizing gaps in stroke care: a two-round Delphi process

Background: Despite international recognition of stroke as a significant health priority, discrepancies persist between the target values for stroke quality measures and the actual values that are achieved in clinical practice, referred to as gaps. This study aimed to reach consensus among international experts on prioritizing gaps in stroke care. Methods: A two-round Delphi process was conducted, surveying an international expert panel in the field of stroke care and cerebrovascular medicine, including patient representatives, healthcare professionals, researchers, policymakers, and medical directors. Experts scored the importance and required effort to close 13 gaps throughout the stroke care continuum and proposed potential solutions. Data were analyzed using descriptive statistics and qualitative analysis methods. Results: In the first and second Delphi rounds, 35 and 30 experts participated, respectively. Expert consensus was reached on the high importance of closing 11 out of 13 gaps. Two out of 13 gaps were considered moderately important to close, with expert consensus for one of these two gaps. Expert consensus indicated that only one gap, related to the prevention of complications after stroke, requires moderate effort to close, whereas the others were considered to require high effort to close. Key focus areas for potential solutions included: “Care infrastructure,” “Geographic disparities,” “Interdisciplinary collaboration,” and “Advocacy and funding.” Conclusions: While closing gaps in stroke care primarily requires high effort and substantial resources, targeted interventions in the identified key focus areas may provide feasible and clinically meaningful improvements.

Text 124532.pdf - Published Version Restricted to Repository staff only Download (455kB) Official URL or Download Paper: https://academic.oup.com/esj/article/10/4/1479/837...

Actions (login required)

View Item