UPM Institutional Repository

Bone marrow seeded bone graft versus bone graft; compact bone critical sized defect healing pattern in rabbit


Citation

Kaveh, Kamran and Ibrahim, Rashid and Tengku Ibrahim, Tengku Azmi and Abu Bakar @ Zakaria, Md Zuki (2010) Bone marrow seeded bone graft versus bone graft; compact bone critical sized defect healing pattern in rabbit. Journal of Animal and Veterinary Advances, 9 (11). pp. 1588-1596. ISSN 1680-5593; ESSN: 1993-601X

Abstract

The main aim of the present study was to investigate the effect of combination of bone marrow as the primary origin of osteoblast and at the same time as the seed cell and corticocancellous bone graft as the natural scaffold in repair of compact bone full thickness segmental critical sized defect in rabbits. Twelve rabbits had been divided into two groups; In Group one, fresh autogenous bone marrow aspirate has been seeded into the scaffold of autogenous corticocancellous bone graft which was utilized to repair critical size compact bone defect in mid shaft of radius. Corticocancellous bone graft alone was used as the Group 2 or control group. Up to 8 weeks, radiographs were taken to evaluate the level of osteogenicity in both groups. Rabbits were euthanized on week eight postoperative and the implants were harvested for gross, histological and scanning electron microscope observations. New bone formation and osteogenesis was observed at the margins and centre of the Group 1. Combination of mature and immature trabecullae covered the defect and bone formation pattern included osteogenesis, osteoinduction and osteocunduction. In the implant of corticocancellous bone graft alone or group 2, the major new bone formation was at the margins of the defect and osteogenesis was not observed at the centre of the defect and the major bone formation pattern was creeping substitution. As the conclusion, combination of bone marrow and corticocancellous bone graft had better results than corticocancellous bone graft alone in osteogenesis potential. Bone formation capability and critical sized defect repair was faster and more efficient and successful in Group 2 defect.


Download File

[img]
Preview
PDF (Abstract)
Bone marrow seeded bone graft versus bone graft.pdf

Download (84kB) | Preview

Additional Metadata

Item Type: Article
Divisions: Faculty of Veterinary Medicine
DOI Number: https://doi.org/10.3923/javaa.2010.1588.1596
Publisher: Medwell Journals
Keywords: Bone graft; Bone marrow; Bone tissue engneering; Critical size defect; Mesenchymal stem cell; Rabbit
Depositing User: Azizan Arshad
Date Deposited: 09 Dec 2013 05:06
Last Modified: 18 Nov 2016 08:31
Altmetrics: http://www.altmetric.com/details.php?domain=psasir.upm.edu.my&doi=10.3923/javaa.2010.1588.1596
URI: http://psasir.upm.edu.my/id/eprint/13440
Statistic Details: View Download Statistic

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item