Keyword Search:

Auditing Firm Reputation, Ex Ante Uncertainty and the Underpricing of Initial Public Offerings on the Second Board of the Kuala Lumpur Stock Exchange: 1990-1995

Mohamad, Shamsher and Md. Nasir, Annuar (1997) Auditing Firm Reputation, Ex Ante Uncertainty and the Underpricing of Initial Public Offerings on the Second Board of the Kuala Lumpur Stock Exchange: 1990-1995. Pertanika Journal of Social Sciences & Humanities, 5 (1). pp. 59-64. ISSN 0128-7702

[img] PDF
2427Kb

Abstract

Reputable auditing firms have an incentive to investigate and report irregularities since their reputation is at stake, therefore engaging their services enables investors to estimate the value of the firm more precisely and reduce ex ante uncenainty. This will attract more investors to bid for the IPO shares and consequently IPOs attested by reputable auditing firms will have a lower premium level. This study tests the conjectured inverse effect of reputation of auditing firms on the level of IPO underpricing of 100 companies listed on the second board of the Kuala Lumpur Stock Exchange, for the period 1990-1995. The reputable auditing firms are the Big Six accounting firms; the others are classified as less reputable. The findings do not support this conjecture, which implies that Malaysian investors assume that all qualified and licensed auditing firms provide homogeneous services. However, the findings show that the undenvriter reputation (UV{) and the past profitability of the firm (NPM) variables are inversely related, whereas the market trend and the standard deviation variables are positively associated to the level of IPO underpricing.

Item Type:Article
Keyword:underpricing, initial public offers, auditor firm reputation, second board
Faculty or Institute:Faculty of Economics and Management
Publisher:Universiti Putra Malaysia Press
ID Code:3156
Deposited By: Nur Izyan Mohd Zaki
Deposited On:24 Nov 2009 11:41
Last Modified:27 May 2013 15:06

Repository Staff Only: Edit item detail